HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L).
HMCT.L and HMCH.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMCT.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jul 27, 2018. HMCH.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. Both HMCT.L and HMCH.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HMCT.L or HMCH.L.
Correlation
The correlation between HMCT.L and HMCH.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HMCT.L:
0.50
HMCH.L:
1.59
HMCT.L:
0.94
HMCH.L:
2.29
HMCT.L:
1.13
HMCH.L:
1.30
HMCT.L:
0.30
HMCH.L:
0.79
HMCT.L:
1.15
HMCH.L:
4.05
HMCT.L:
12.34%
HMCH.L:
10.43%
HMCT.L:
28.62%
HMCH.L:
26.66%
HMCT.L:
-49.06%
HMCH.L:
-56.50%
HMCT.L:
-35.26%
HMCH.L:
-31.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCT.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than HMCH.L's 15.67% return.
HMCT.L
1.62%
3.47%
17.79%
14.79%
0.87%
N/A
HMCH.L
15.67%
14.70%
38.01%
42.98%
-0.47%
4.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HMCT.L and HMCH.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HMCT.L
HMCH.L
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Dividend Comparison
HMCT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than HMCH.L's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCT.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 2.17% | 2.03% | 2.16% | 1.69% | 1.12% | 0.84% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | 2.05% | 2.17% | 2.12% | 1.85% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 2.84% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCT.L drawdown since its inception was -49.06%, smaller than the maximum HMCH.L drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCT.L and HMCH.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HMCT.L vs. HMCH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L) is 4.67%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that HMCT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.