C300.L vs. IAPD.L
C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and IAPD.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - C300.L is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China A 300 Index, while IAPD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, C300.L returned 15.49%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for IAPD.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C300.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IAPD.L.
Performance
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C300.L is traded in USD, while IAPD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IAPD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C300.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than IAPD.L's 15.29% return.
C300.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 38.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAPD.L
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 12.15% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 15.29% | 30.05% | 6.09% | 12.89% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between C300.L and IAPD.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C300.L vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank
C300.L
IAPD.L
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C300.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 4.10 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | 11.01 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C300.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -70.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C300.L and IAPD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C300.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -70.10% | +38.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -7.96% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.06% | -18.35% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -1.30% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -13.01% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.97% | -0.34% |
Volatility
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 3.63%. This indicates that C300.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C300.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 3.63% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 10.36% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 12.71% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 14.99% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 16.74% | +5.60% |
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C300.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
C300.L vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison
C300.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 4.16% | 4.20% | 5.25% | 5.77% | 6.84% | 5.51% | 3.70% | 5.67% | 5.87% | 4.71% | 4.22% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C300.L and IAPD.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C300.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C300.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.L.
C300.L is categorized as China Equities, while IAPD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index, while IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for C300.L and 0.59% for IAPD.L.
Find the right allocation for C300.L and IAPD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer