C300.L vs. CSUK.L
C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and CSUK.L (iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - C300.L is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China A 300 Index, while CSUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, C300.L returned 16.69%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for CSUK.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C300.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CSUK.L.
Performance
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C300.L is traded in USD, while CSUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C300.L achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than CSUK.L's 5.72% return.
C300.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- 1Y
- 51.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSUK.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 15.23% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
CSUK.L iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.72% | 34.71% | 7.10% | 12.50% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between C300.L and CSUK.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C300.L vs. CSUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
C300.L
CSUK.L
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C300.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.27 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.55 | 2.11 | +5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.22 | 7.37 | +15.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C300.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 1.49 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.36 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C300.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, smaller than the maximum CSUK.L drawdown of -43.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C300.L and CSUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C300.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -43.14% | +11.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -9.61% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.06% | -13.12% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -4.58% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.10% | -8.43% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.76% | -0.53% |
Volatility
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that C300.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C300.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.69% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 11.51% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 13.62% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 16.43% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 18.26% | +3.82% |
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C300.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUK.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
C300.L vs. CSUK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither C300.L nor CSUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
C300.L and CSUK.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSUK.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSUK.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for C300.L.
C300.L is categorized as China Equities, while CSUK.L is Europe Equities. C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index, while CSUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for C300.L and 0.33% for CSUK.L.
Find the right allocation for C300.L and CSUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer