C300.L vs. ARKQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).
C300.L and ARKQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C300.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A 300 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014.
Performance
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 2.00% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | -0.13% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -19.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C300.L achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's -0.13% return.
C300.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 72.46%
- 3Y*
- 31.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
C300.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
C300.L vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
C300.L
ARKQ
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C300.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 2.00 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 2.60 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 3.56 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 11.10 | +3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C300.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.00 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between C300.L and ARKQ is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
C300.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C300.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C300.L and ARKQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| C300.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -59.89% | +28.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -20.58% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -14.58% | +10.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -17.43% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 6.60% | -4.26% |
Volatility
C300.L vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) is 6.07%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that C300.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| C300.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 11.83% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 25.90% | -13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 36.50% | -18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 31.96% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 29.63% | -7.50% |