C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE
C101.DE (Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)) and WEBG.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - C101.DE is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while WEBG.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, C101.DE returned 6.82% vs 25.99% for WEBG.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C101.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBG.DE.
Performance
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C101.DE achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than WEBG.DE's 13.52% return.
C101.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
WEBG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
C101.DE Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.67% | -7.37% | 9.15% |
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 13.52% | 9.19% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between C101.DE and WEBG.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C101.DE
WEBG.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C101.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.65 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | 2.93 | +1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C101.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum WEBG.DE drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C101.DE and WEBG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C101.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | -21.31% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.45% | -15.74% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -1.30% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -5.93% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 8.88% | -7.42% |
Volatility
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) is 1.71%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that C101.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C101.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 3.76% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 8.89% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 24.40% | -18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 20.64% | -13.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 20.64% | -13.62% |
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C101.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBG.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C101.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison
C101.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while WEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C101.DE Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.31% | 4.51% | 5.40% | 4.63% | 0.37% | 0.14% | 1.13% | 1.83% | 1.52% |
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.22% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C101.DE and WEBG.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for C101.DE.
C101.DE is categorized as Money Market, while WEBG.DE is Global Equities. C101.DE tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for C101.DE and 0.07% for WEBG.DE.
Find the right allocation for C101.DE and WEBG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer