PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Dist) (EGV2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C101.DE achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than EGV2.DE's 1.27% return.


C101.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.80%
6M
4.56%
YTD
4.67%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
2.02%

EGV2.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.02%
6M
1.23%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
C101.DE
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.67%-7.37%11.40%1.49%7.85%8.35%-3.63%
EGV2.DE
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.27%2.48%4.10%3.25%0.17%-0.47%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between C101.DE and EGV2.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C101.DE
C101.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
C101.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C101.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
C101.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
C101.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
C101.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EGV2.DE
EGV2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EGV2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGV2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGV2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EGV2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGV2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Dist) (EGV2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


C101.DEEGV2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.49

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

7.81

-5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

33.51

-28.85

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C101.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the EGV2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C101.DE and EGV2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C101.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, which is greater than EGV2.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C101.DE and EGV2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C101.DEEGV2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-0.86%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-0.31%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.67%

-0.31%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.67%

-0.48%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-0.01%

-5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-0.22%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.07%

+1.39%

Volatility

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Dist) (EGV2.DE) at 0.32%. This indicates that C101.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGV2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C101.DEEGV2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

0.32%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

0.88%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

1.08%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

0.72%

+6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.02%

0.68%

+6.34%

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both C101.DE and EGV2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

C101.DE vs. EGV2.DE - Dividend Comparison

C101.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than EGV2.DE's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
C101.DE
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.31%4.51%5.40%4.63%0.37%0.14%1.13%1.83%1.52%
EGV2.DE
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.93%2.97%3.91%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


C101.DE and EGV2.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C101.DE and EGV2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

C101.DE tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while EGV2.DE tracks ESTR Compounded Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C101.DE and EGV2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer