PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) and Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Dist) (DXS1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C101.DE achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than DXS1.DE's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, C101.DE has outperformed DXS1.DE with an annualized return of 2.02%, while DXS1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


C101.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.80%
6M
4.56%
YTD
4.67%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
2.02%

DXS1.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.20%
6M
3.49%
YTD
3.66%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C101.DE
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.67%-7.37%11.40%1.49%7.85%8.35%-8.62%4.98%6.68%-11.53%
DXS1.DE
Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.66%-0.80%10.14%6.73%-4.26%7.63%-5.68%6.58%-1.34%-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between C101.DE and DXS1.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.29

The correlation between C101.DE and DXS1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C101.DE
C101.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
C101.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C101.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
C101.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
C101.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
C101.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DXS1.DE
DXS1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DXS1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXS1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXS1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DXS1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXS1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) and Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Dist) (DXS1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


C101.DEDXS1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.70

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

6.84

-2.18

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C101.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the DXS1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C101.DE and DXS1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C101.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum DXS1.DE drawdown of -30.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C101.DE and DXS1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C101.DEDXS1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-30.55%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-1.64%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.67%

-4.61%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.67%

-7.36%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.21%

-16.71%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-2.91%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-12.80%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.65%

+0.81%

Volatility

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Dist) (DXS1.DE) at 0.81%. This indicates that C101.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXS1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C101.DEDXS1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

0.81%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

2.72%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

4.06%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

5.38%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.02%

9.01%

-1.99%

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both C101.DE and DXS1.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

C101.DE vs. DXS1.DE - Dividend Comparison

C101.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than DXS1.DE's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C101.DE
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.31%4.51%5.40%4.63%0.37%0.14%1.13%1.83%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DXS1.DE
Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.08%4.75%4.91%4.04%0.35%0.02%0.57%0.95%0.63%0.20%1.28%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


C101.DE and DXS1.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C101.DE and DXS1.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

C101.DE tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while DXS1.DE tracks Solactive SONIA Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C101.DE and DXS1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer