C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE
C030.DE (Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - C030.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C030.DE returned 10.19%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C030.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C030.DE achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, C030.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 10.19%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.
C030.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C030.DE Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 4.27% | 18.43% | 7.60% | 16.13% | -13.47% | 31.43% | 4.07% | 33.96% | -8.34% | 9.75% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | 3.18% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between C030.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2008 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between C030.DE and LYMS.DE has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C030.DE
LYMS.DE
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C030.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.42 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.77 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 11.23 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C030.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.40 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.94 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.08 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.77 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C030.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C030.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C030.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -50.00% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -10.02% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.50% | -26.74% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | -31.12% | +11.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.54% | -31.12% | +1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -0.86% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -8.78% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.37% | -0.07% |
Volatility
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C030.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.37% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 10.99% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 15.73% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 19.91% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 19.68% | -3.69% |
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C030.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C030.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
C030.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C030.DE Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 1.27% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 1.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 2.78% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C030.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for C030.DE.
C030.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. C030.DE tracks Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C030.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for C030.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer