PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C030.DE achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, C030.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 10.19%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.


C030.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
2.51%
YTD
4.27%
6M
7.62%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.19%

LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
16.45%
YTD
63.83%
6M
64.57%
1Y
130.64%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
4.27%18.43%7.60%16.13%-13.47%31.43%4.07%33.96%-8.34%9.75%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%-34.66%37.56%23.03%39.73%-5.73%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between C030.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2008

0.39

The correlation between C030.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C030.DE
C030.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
C030.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C030.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
C030.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
C030.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
C030.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C030.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.59

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

10.37

-9.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

32.83

-28.71

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C030.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C030.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C030.DELSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

4.27

-3.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.15

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.09

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.82

-0.03

Drawdowns

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C030.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C030.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C030.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-39.77%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-12.53%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-36.22%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

-39.77%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.54%

-39.77%

+10.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-3.34%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-9.37%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.96%

-0.66%

Volatility

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) is 4.16%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that C030.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C030.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

11.23%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

22.18%

-11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

30.40%

-17.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

31.21%

-16.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

26.06%

-10.07%

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C030.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

C030.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

C030.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
1.27%1.32%1.52%2.68%2.21%1.70%2.04%2.37%2.78%2.76%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


C030.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, C030.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C030.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

C030.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. C030.DE tracks Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C030.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C030.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer