C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE
C030.DE (Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist) and CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - C030.DE tracks the Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30 while CEMS.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C030.DE returned 10.19%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for CEMS.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C030.DE achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, C030.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 10.19%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.
C030.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C030.DE Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 4.27% | 18.43% | 7.60% | 16.13% | -13.47% | 31.43% | 4.07% | 33.96% | -8.34% | 9.75% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 23.48% | -14.04% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between C030.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.69 |
The correlation between C030.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C030.DE
CEMS.DE
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C030.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.29 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 12.37 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C030.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.37 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.94 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.61 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.49 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C030.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C030.DE and CEMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C030.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -40.20% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -9.99% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.50% | -17.57% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | -19.55% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.54% | -40.20% | +10.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -1.26% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -7.49% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 2.66% | +0.64% |
Volatility
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) is 4.16%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that C030.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C030.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.65% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 11.17% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 13.87% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 15.23% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.43% | -1.44% |
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both C030.DE and CEMS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C030.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
C030.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C030.DE Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist | 1.27% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 1.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 2.78% | 2.76% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C030.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C030.DE and CEMS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
C030.DE tracks Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for C030.DE and CEMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer