PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


C030.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
2.51%
YTD
4.27%
6M
7.62%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.19%

5HEU.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
4.27%18.43%7.60%16.13%-7.44%
5HEU.DE
Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%4.88%-2.91%6.26%-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between C030.DE and 5HEU.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between C030.DE and 5HEU.DE has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C030.DE
C030.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
C030.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C030.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
C030.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
C030.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
C030.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

5HEU.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) and Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C030.DE5HEU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C030.DE5HEU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

Drawdowns

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C030.DE5HEU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

Volatility

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C030.DE5HEU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C030.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HEU.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

C030.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Dividend Comparison

C030.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while 5HEU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
5HEU.DE
Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
1.27%1.32%1.52%2.68%2.21%1.70%2.04%2.37%2.78%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


C030.DE and 5HEU.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, C030.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C030.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.

C030.DE tracks Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30, while 5HEU.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C030.DE and 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C030.DE and 5HEU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer