PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYRN vs. FNMAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -81.06% return, which is significantly lower than FNMAS's -38.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed FNMAS with an annualized return of 2.85%, while FNMAS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.08% annualized return.


BYRN

1D
-4.79%
1M
-46.10%
6M
-81.13%
YTD
-81.06%
1Y
-85.37%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-33.16%
10Y*
2.85%
ALL TIME*
1.57%

FNMAS

1D
-0.11%
1M
-20.67%
6M
-24.12%
YTD
-38.02%
1Y
-37.85%
3Y*
61.53%
5Y*
35.85%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-81.06%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%
FNMAS
Federal National Mortgage Association
-38.02%27.66%270.50%37.61%-25.00%-63.64%-28.20%71.94%-21.02%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BYRN and FNMAS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYRN:

$72.16M

FNMAS:

$7.41B

EPS

BYRN:

-$0.16

FNMAS:

$2.77

PS Ratio

BYRN:

0.69

FNMAS:

0.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYRN:

$108.86M

FNMAS:

$160.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYRN:

$57.17M

FNMAS:

$85.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYRN:

-$3.55M

FNMAS:

$143.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYRN vs. FNMAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FNMAS
FNMAS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FNMAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMAS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMAS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYRNFNMASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

0.83

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.82

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.61

-1.65

+0.04

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYRN Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is comparable to the FNMAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYRN and FNMAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FNMAS drawdown of -89.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and FNMAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYRNFNMASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-89.36%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.49%

-46.27%

-42.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.70%

-46.27%

-44.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.51%

-63.55%

-28.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.51%

-89.36%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.70%

-46.27%

-44.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.56%

-42.60%

-9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.97%

23.00%

+29.97%

Volatility

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Volatility Comparison

Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 46.03% compared to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS) at 6.34%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYRNFNMASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.03%

6.34%

+39.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.23%

32.33%

+41.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.65%

40.20%

+39.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.01%

60.00%

+15.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.25%

61.27%

+34.98%

Dividends

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYRN nor FNMAS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
16.39M
40.22B
(BYRN) Total Revenue
(FNMAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BYRN vs. FNMAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
10.9%
0
Portfolio components
BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

FNMAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

FNMAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.

FNMAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYRN and FNMAS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (46.03%) compared to FNMAS (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs FNMAS's -89.36%.

FNMAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYRN and FNMAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer