PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYM vs. EOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYM vs. EOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Municipal Income Quality Trust (BYM) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (EOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BYM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EOT

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
1.57%
6M
4.27%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYM vs. EOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYM
BlackRock Municipal Income Quality Trust
2.02%7.27%2.29%3.11%-23.42%7.62%12.74%17.64%-7.54%7.71%
EOT
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
1.57%7.97%1.90%7.67%-22.32%11.41%-1.56%21.98%-12.85%14.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BYM and EOT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2009

0.36

The correlation between BYM and EOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BYM:

-$0.14

EOT:

$1.69

PS Ratio

BYM:

6.24

EOT:

10.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYM:

$45.89M

EOT:

$26.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYM:

$41.83M

EOT:

$13.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

BYM:

$11.98M

EOT:

$39.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYM vs. EOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYM

EOT
EOT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYM vs. EOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Municipal Income Quality Trust (BYM) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (EOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BYM vs. EOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BYMEOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

Drawdowns

BYM vs. EOT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYMEOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

BYM vs. EOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYMEOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

Dividends

BYM vs. EOT - Dividend Comparison

BYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than EOT's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYM
BlackRock Municipal Income Quality Trust
4.52%6.09%5.89%4.20%5.74%4.46%3.99%4.27%5.23%5.33%5.84%5.77%
EOT
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
4.87%4.85%4.77%4.43%4.56%3.44%3.80%4.73%6.13%5.12%5.97%4.83%

Financials

BYM vs. EOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Municipal Income Quality Trust and Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
11.76M
5.37M
(BYM) Total Revenue
(EOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BYM and EOT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYM and EOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer