PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BYBG.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L has underperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 12.74%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.35% annualized return.


BYBG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.89%
6M
6.00%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
20.33%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
12.74%

XS2D.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.22%
6M
14.31%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
32.18%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
23.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYBG.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
9.61%9.41%15.83%9.58%-1.29%35.95%1.99%26.54%-3.60%10.09%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.66%17.56%48.20%41.43%-31.85%64.57%17.41%56.67%-10.94%31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BYBG.L and XS2D.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2015

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between BYBG.L and XS2D.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BYBG.L
XS2D.L

Financial Services

26.6%
6.0%

Technology

25.6%
56.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
9.3%

Industrials

8.8%
5.9%

Healthcare

7.1%
5.7%

Energy

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.2%

Utilities

0.8%
4.9%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Financial Services

BYBG.L
26.6%
XS2D.L
6.0%

Technology

BYBG.L
25.6%
XS2D.L
56.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BYBG.L
15.3%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Industrials

BYBG.L
8.8%
XS2D.L
5.9%

Healthcare

BYBG.L
7.1%
XS2D.L
5.7%

Energy

BYBG.L
4.8%
XS2D.L

-

Communication Services

BYBG.L
4.4%
XS2D.L
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

BYBG.L
3.7%
XS2D.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

BYBG.L
3.1%
XS2D.L
2.2%

Utilities

BYBG.L
0.8%
XS2D.L
4.9%

Real Estate

BYBG.L

-

XS2D.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYBG.L
BYBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYBG.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.61

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

9.44

+0.73

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYBG.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.82%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYBG.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.82%

-54.44%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-15.77%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-36.46%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-37.20%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.57%

-54.44%

+18.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.98%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-8.12%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

4.37%

-2.64%

Volatility

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) is 3.32%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that BYBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYBG.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

5.50%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

17.77%

-9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

23.63%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

30.26%

-15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

31.28%

-13.42%

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYBG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BYBG.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYBG.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BYBG.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BYBG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BYBG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

BYBG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBG.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYBG.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer