BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L
BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) and SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - BYBG.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR while SPY5.L tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L returned 13.89%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for SPY5.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BYBG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY5.L.
Performance
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BYBG.L is traded in GBp, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.L's 10.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L has underperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of 13.89%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
SPY5.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.46% | 9.41% | 15.83% | 9.58% | -1.29% | 35.95% | 1.99% | 26.54% | -3.60% | 10.09% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.73% | 9.06% | 27.55% | 20.31% | -9.02% | 30.50% | 14.06% | 25.87% | 0.54% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBG.L and SPY5.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2015 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BYBG.L and SPY5.L has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Technology
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Cyclical
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Industrials
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Healthcare
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Energy
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Communication Services
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Defensive
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Basic Materials
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Utilities
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
Real Estate
BYBG.L
-
SPY5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBG.L
SPY5.L
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 4.02 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | 13.69 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.45 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.97 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.98 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.01 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than SPY5.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and SPY5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.57% | -25.97% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -7.19% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -21.10% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -21.10% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.57% | -25.97% | -9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -3.27% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.12% | -0.40% |
Volatility
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) is 2.72%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that BYBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYBG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 3.42% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 8.52% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 11.82% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 15.35% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 16.47% | +1.55% |
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BYBG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BYBG.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison
BYBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYBG.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBG.L.
BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBG.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.
Find the right allocation for BYBG.L and SPY5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer