PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BYBG.L is traded in GBp, while SPXE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPXE.L's 8.63% return.


BYBG.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.21%
6M
6.44%
YTD
9.26%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
12.62%

SPXE.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-2.67%
6M
7.06%
YTD
8.63%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BYBG.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
9.26%9.41%15.83%9.58%-1.29%35.95%27.86%
SPXE.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.63%9.57%26.72%21.98%-8.25%33.54%21.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BYBG.L and SPXE.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BYBG.L and SPXE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYBG.L
BYBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXE.L
SPXE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPXE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYBG.LSPXE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

3.21

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

11.49

-0.99

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPXE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYBG.L and SPXE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.82%, which is greater than SPXE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and SPXE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYBG.LSPXE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.82%

-21.81%

-24.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-6.78%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-21.81%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-21.81%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.89%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-3.35%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.90%

-0.17%

Volatility

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that BYBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYBG.LSPXE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.26%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

9.35%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

12.18%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

15.66%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

18.23%

-0.38%

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYBG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXE.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BYBG.L vs. SPXE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYBG.L nor SPXE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BYBG.L and SPXE.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBG.L.

BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while SPXE.L tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBG.L and 0.09% for SPXE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYBG.L and SPXE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer