BYBG.L vs. IITU.L
BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BYBG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L returned 13.89%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 13.89%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.46% | 9.41% | 15.83% | 9.58% | -1.29% | 35.95% | 1.99% | 26.54% | -3.60% | 10.09% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBG.L and IITU.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BYBG.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BYBG.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
BYBG.L
IITU.L
Consumer Cyclical
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
BYBG.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
BYBG.L
IITU.L
Communication Services
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
BYBG.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
BYBG.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBG.L
IITU.L
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 3.17 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | 8.17 | +5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.71 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.16 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 1.28 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.23 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.57% | -28.03% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -16.76% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -28.03% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -28.03% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.57% | -28.03% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -5.14% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 6.51% | -4.79% |
Volatility
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) is 2.72%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that BYBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYBG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 7.01% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 14.45% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 19.60% | -8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 21.94% | -6.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 21.31% | -3.29% |
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BYBG.L and IITU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BYBG.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BYBG.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BYBG.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BYBG.L and IITU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
BYBG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for BYBG.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer