BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L).
BYBG.L and ICSU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BYBG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. It was launched on Jan 31, 2018. ICSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both BYBG.L and ICSU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.58% | 9.41% | 15.83% | 9.58% | -1.29% | 35.95% | 1.99% | 26.54% | -3.60% | 9.23% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.59% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -3.96% | -2.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than ICSU.L's 8.59% return.
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BYBG.L and ICSU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBG.L
ICSU.L
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.23 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.43 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.40 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 1.00 | +5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.23 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.51 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBG.L and ICSU.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BYBG.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and ICSU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.57% | -18.54% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -8.01% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -13.70% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -5.67% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -4.91% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.23% | -1.23% |
Volatility
BYBG.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) is 3.28%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that BYBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BYBG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 5.08% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 10.24% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 13.80% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 13.13% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 14.20% | +3.87% |