PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BYBG.L is traded in GBp, while HDLV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HDLV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYBG.L achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than HDLV.L's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BYBG.L has outperformed HDLV.L with an annualized return of 12.74%, while HDLV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


BYBG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.89%
6M
6.00%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
20.33%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
12.74%

HDLV.L

1D
2.03%
1M
3.83%
6M
8.64%
YTD
12.33%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYBG.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
9.61%9.41%15.83%9.58%-1.29%35.95%1.99%26.54%-3.60%10.09%
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
12.33%-3.80%18.42%-3.86%12.39%25.99%-13.53%14.29%-1.61%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BYBG.L and HDLV.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between BYBG.L and HDLV.L has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BYBG.L
HDLV.L

Financial Services

26.6%
16.1%

Technology

25.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
3.5%

Industrials

8.8%
0.0%

Healthcare

7.1%
5.1%

Energy

4.8%
11.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
18.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Utilities

0.8%
13.9%

Real Estate

-

21.3%

Financial Services

BYBG.L
26.6%
HDLV.L
16.1%

Technology

BYBG.L
25.6%
HDLV.L
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BYBG.L
15.3%
HDLV.L
3.5%

Industrials

BYBG.L
8.8%
HDLV.L
0.0%

Healthcare

BYBG.L
7.1%
HDLV.L
5.1%

Energy

BYBG.L
4.8%
HDLV.L
11.9%

Communication Services

BYBG.L
4.4%
HDLV.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

BYBG.L
3.7%
HDLV.L
18.2%

Basic Materials

BYBG.L
3.1%
HDLV.L

-

Utilities

BYBG.L
0.8%
HDLV.L
13.9%

Real Estate

BYBG.L

-

HDLV.L
21.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYBG.L
BYBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLV.L
HDLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYBG.LHDLV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.22

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

5.51

+4.66

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYBG.L and HDLV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYBG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.82%, which is greater than HDLV.L's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBG.L and HDLV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYBG.LHDLV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.82%

-34.18%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-6.62%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-15.52%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-17.87%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.57%

-34.18%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-6.23%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.67%

-0.94%

Volatility

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) is 3.32%, while Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that BYBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYBG.LHDLV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.79%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

9.73%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

11.98%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

13.98%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.22%

+1.64%

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYBG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BYBG.L vs. HDLV.L - Dividend Comparison

BYBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYBG.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
3.44%3.91%3.54%4.04%3.56%3.37%4.35%3.69%3.79%3.07%3.07%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


BYBG.L and HDLV.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BYBG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BYBG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.

BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBG.L and 0.30% for HDLV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYBG.L and HDLV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer