BWTG vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BWTG (Brendan Wood TopGun ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BWTG is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, BWTG returned 16.62% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BWTG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

BWTG vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWTG achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.

BWTG

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 13.93%
• YTD: 47.92%
• 6M: 46.01%
• 1Y: 58.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWTG vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF	5.71%	16.45%	20.68%	5.60%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	47.92%	12.95%	-6.17%	8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BWTG and NRSH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.63

The correlation between BWTG and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

BWTG vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BWTG	NRSH
Technology	26.8%	35.5%
Financial Services	22.4%	-
Industrials	14.9%	58.7%
Real Estate	12.0%	5.8%
Healthcare	6.8%	-
Communication Services	4.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	-
Utilities	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

BWTG vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWTG

BWTG Risk / Return Rank: 41
BWTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BWTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BWTG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BWTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BWTG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWTG vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BWTG	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.42	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.11	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	5.40	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	16.86	-9.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BWTG vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWTG and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BWTG	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.42	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	1.11	+0.50

Drawdowns

BWTG vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWTG drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWTG and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWTG	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.18%	-24.01%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-10.94%	+1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	0.00%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-5.62%	+3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	3.50%	-1.26%

Volatility

BWTG vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is 4.13%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that BWTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWTG	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	9.21%	-5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	20.27%	-10.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	24.44%	-12.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	21.54%	-7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	21.54%	-7.57%

BWTG vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWTG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWTG vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

BWTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF	0.33%	0.35%	0.25%	0.19%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.28%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWTG and NRSH in my portfolio?

BWTG and NRSH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWTG or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to BWTG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWTG dropped -13.18% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, BWTG or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 16.62% for BWTG. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BWTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWTG or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 16.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWTG or NRSH?

NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BWTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWTG or NRSH?

BWTG has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between BWTG and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: Brendan Wood and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BWTG and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.