PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWTG vs. CVSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWTG vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BWTG

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.13%
YTD
5.71%
6M
5.47%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
8.06%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWTG vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BWTG
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF
5.71%16.45%20.68%12.60%
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.00%10.14%19.11%11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BWTG and CVSE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between BWTG and CVSE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BWTG vs. CVSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BWTG
CVSE

Technology

26.8%
39.5%

Financial Services

22.4%
16.3%

Industrials

14.9%
11.3%

Real Estate

12.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
10.3%

Communication Services

4.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
7.0%

Utilities

3.6%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.7%

Energy

-

-

Technology

BWTG
26.8%
CVSE
39.5%

Financial Services

BWTG
22.4%
CVSE
16.3%

Industrials

BWTG
14.9%
CVSE
11.3%

Real Estate

BWTG
12.0%
CVSE
3.5%

Healthcare

BWTG
6.8%
CVSE
10.3%

Communication Services

BWTG
4.6%
CVSE
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

BWTG
4.3%
CVSE
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BWTG
4.3%
CVSE
7.0%

Utilities

BWTG
3.6%
CVSE
2.5%

Basic Materials

BWTG

-

CVSE
2.7%

Energy

BWTG

-

CVSE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWTG vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWTG
BWTG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BWTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BWTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWTG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CVSE
CVSE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWTG vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWTGCVSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.66

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

5.71

+1.73

BWTG vs. CVSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the CVSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWTG and CVSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWTGCVSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.28

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.92

+0.69

Drawdowns

BWTG vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWTG drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum CVSE drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWTG and CVSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWTGCVSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-20.29%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-3.08%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.68%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-2.69%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.42%

+0.82%

Volatility

BWTG vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison

Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that BWTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWTGCVSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

0.00%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

0.00%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

6.49%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

13.87%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.97%

13.87%

+0.10%

BWTG vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWTG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BWTG vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison

BWTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than CVSE's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BWTG
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF
0.33%0.35%0.25%0.19%
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.59%0.81%1.05%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWTG and CVSE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWTG has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to CVSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWTG dropped -13.18% vs CVSE's -20.29%.

On 1-year performance, BWTG leads with 16.62% vs 8.06% for CVSE. On fees, CVSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CVSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BWTG has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BWTG.

CVSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.33% for BWTG.

They also come from different issuers: Brendan Wood and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BWTG and 0.29% for CVSE.

BWTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWTG and CVSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer