PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVSIX vs. LSVVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baywood Socially Responsible Fund (BVSIX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVSIX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 20.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BVSIX having a 10.93% annualized return and LSVVX not far ahead at 11.12%.


BVSIX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.36%
6M
6.72%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

LSVVX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.40%
6M
16.55%
YTD
20.59%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVSIX
Baywood Socially Responsible Fund
9.67%9.36%14.58%12.73%-0.72%26.88%4.25%26.56%-12.79%16.74%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
20.59%19.63%3.97%12.19%-4.02%28.57%-3.46%25.29%-11.10%16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BVSIX and LSVVX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.94

The correlation between BVSIX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVSIX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVSIX
BVSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BVSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BVSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

LSVVX
LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baywood Socially Responsible Fund (BVSIX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVSIXLSVVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.59

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

5.83

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

23.09

-16.60

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the LSVVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVSIX and LSVVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.73%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVSIX and LSVVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVSIXLSVVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.73%

-61.62%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-6.23%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-24.61%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-24.61%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

-40.61%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.76%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-12.10%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.58%

+0.76%

Volatility

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison

Baywood Socially Responsible Fund (BVSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that BVSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVSIXLSVVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.68%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

8.14%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

11.22%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

15.84%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

18.42%

-0.54%

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVSIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVSIX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison

BVSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than LSVVX's 11.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVSIX
Baywood Socially Responsible Fund
3.43%3.64%4.15%4.02%3.75%4.08%1.99%2.44%10.28%2.39%1.19%0.00%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
11.35%13.69%2.45%6.57%5.41%3.67%2.40%21.48%3.91%1.98%2.37%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVSIX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVSIX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to LSVVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVSIX dropped -40.73% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.

LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVSIX and LSVVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer