PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVEFX vs. NQCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Becker Equity Fund (BVEFX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVEFX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 20.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BVEFX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.50% annualized return.


BVEFX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.92%
6M
8.55%
YTD
13.01%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
11.16%
ALL TIME*
9.67%

NQCRX

1D
1.20%
1M
0.90%
6M
14.65%
YTD
20.39%
1Y
34.51%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*
14.50%
ALL TIME*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVEFX
Becker Equity Fund
13.01%13.13%16.05%9.53%-7.51%29.35%4.04%23.05%-13.68%15.19%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
20.39%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BVEFX and NQCRX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006

0.94

The correlation between BVEFX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVEFX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVEFX
BVEFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BVEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BVEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Becker Equity Fund (BVEFX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVEFXNQCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

5.37

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

20.17

-9.81

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVEFX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVEFX drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVEFX and NQCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVEFXNQCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.63%

-57.85%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-6.07%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-17.21%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-17.61%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-41.84%

+7.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.30%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-9.93%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.62%

+0.12%

Volatility

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Becker Equity Fund (BVEFX) is 2.58%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that BVEFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVEFXNQCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.10%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

9.74%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

12.69%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

15.54%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

18.80%

-2.57%

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVEFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVEFX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

BVEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than NQCRX's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVEFX
Becker Equity Fund
8.65%9.78%6.31%11.75%8.46%12.00%2.41%2.21%9.17%5.06%15.31%8.18%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.07%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVEFX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to BVEFX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVEFX dropped -50.63% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVEFX and NQCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer