PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVATX vs. BBNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVATX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than BBNTX's 0.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BVATX having a 1.41% annualized return and BBNTX not far ahead at 1.46%.


BVATX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.22%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
1.41%

BBNTX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
3.11%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVATX
Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund
0.79%4.70%0.32%3.60%-5.59%-0.59%4.28%6.32%0.79%3.28%
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
0.72%5.19%0.45%3.64%-5.86%-0.23%4.26%6.09%0.73%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BVATX and BBNTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 1999

0.89

The correlation between BVATX and BBNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVATX vs. BBNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVATX
BVATX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BVATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BVATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVATX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BBNTX
BBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVATXBBNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.58

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.68

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

5.08

+0.32

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BBNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVATX and BBNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVATX drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, roughly equal to the maximum BBNTX drawdown of -10.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVATX and BBNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVATXBBNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-10.25%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-2.81%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

-4.15%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.97%

-10.16%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.24%

-10.25%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.07%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.46%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.92%

-0.09%

Volatility

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX) and Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) have volatilities of 0.55% and 0.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVATXBBNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.54%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

1.75%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

2.11%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

2.84%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.19%

3.22%

-0.03%

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVATX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BBNTX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVATX vs. BBNTX - Dividend Comparison

BVATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than BBNTX's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.68%3.52%2.82%2.07%1.94%1.59%1.62%2.43%2.51%2.39%2.73%2.98%
BVATX
Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund
2.54%3.36%2.67%1.89%1.81%1.65%2.03%2.27%2.24%2.20%3.06%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVATX and BBNTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVATX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to BBNTX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVATX dropped -10.24% vs BBNTX's -10.25%.

BVATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVATX and BBNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer