PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYW vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYW vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


BUYW

1D
0.35%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.27%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYW vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
3.39%9.08%0.36%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%20.32%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYW and PEPS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.66

The correlation between BUYW and PEPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYW vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYW vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUYWPEPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.45

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

3.22

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

3.26

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.24

15.28

+4.97

BUYW vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYW Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYW and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUYWPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.45

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.05

+0.12

Drawdowns

BUYW vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYWPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-21.26%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-9.80%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.51%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-2.77%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

2.09%

-1.61%

Volatility

BUYW vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) is 1.02%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that BUYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYWPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

2.77%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

9.83%

-5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

13.06%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

18.31%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

18.31%

-9.84%

BUYW vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYW vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.91%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYW and PEPS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEPS has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to BUYW (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYW dropped -9.36% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs 9.76% for BUYW. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.10% for PEPS.

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYW and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer