BUYW vs. PBTP
BUYW (Main Buywrite ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Main Funds, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). BUYW is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUYW returned 8.73%/yr vs 5.23%/yr for PBTP. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUYW charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
BUYW vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 2.15% return.
BUYW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 9.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BUYW vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 3.39% | 9.08% | 9.82% | 12.80% | 1.46% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 2.15% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 4.53% | -1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYW and PBTP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022 | 0.11 |
The correlation between BUYW and PBTP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYW vs. PBTP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYW
PBTP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
BUYW
PBTP
-
Communication Services
BUYW
PBTP
-
Financial Services
BUYW
PBTP
Energy
BUYW
PBTP
-
Healthcare
BUYW
PBTP
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYW
PBTP
-
Industrials
BUYW
PBTP
-
Consumer Defensive
BUYW
PBTP
-
Utilities
BUYW
PBTP
-
Basic Materials
BUYW
PBTP
-
Real Estate
BUYW
PBTP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYW vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
BUYW
PBTP
BUYW vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYW | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.66 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 7.08 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.24 | 24.51 | -4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYW | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 3.05 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
BUYW vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYW | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -5.44% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -0.66% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -1.03% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.02% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -0.75% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 0.19% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BUYW vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.40%. This indicates that BUYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYW | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.40% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 1.03% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.85% | 1.54% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 2.85% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 2.64% | +5.83% |
BUYW vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYW vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 5.91% | 5.89% | 5.93% | 5.95% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 3.10% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYW and PBTP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYW has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYW dropped -9.36% vs PBTP's -5.44%.
On 3-year performance, BUYW leads with 8.73% vs 5.23% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.
BUYW has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.
BUYW is categorized as Derivative Income, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.07% for PBTP.
PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYW and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer