BUT.L vs. WSML.L
BUT.L (Brunner Investment Trust) is a stock, while WSML.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, BUT.L returned 10.60%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for WSML.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BUT.L is traded in GBp, while WSML.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WSML.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUT.L achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than WSML.L's 14.85% return.
BUT.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
WSML.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 3.93% | -1.01% | 24.71% | 20.20% | -6.09% | 31.65% | -3.13% | 34.38% | -4.60% |
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.85% | 11.40% | 9.28% | 11.21% | -8.94% | 16.32% | 13.07% | 19.62% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUT.L and WSML.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between BUT.L and WSML.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUT.L vs. WSML.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUT.L
WSML.L
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUT.L | WSML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.43 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.23 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | 15.86 | -13.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUT.L | WSML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.40 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUT.L drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than WSML.L's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUT.L and WSML.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUT.L | WSML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.93% | -33.63% | -31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -7.91% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -21.49% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -21.49% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | 0.00% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -6.44% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.11% | +0.96% |
Volatility
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) is 3.34%, while iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that BUT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUT.L | WSML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.08% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 10.73% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 13.96% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 16.85% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 18.19% | +1.59% |
Dividends
BUT.L vs. WSML.L - Dividend Comparison
BUT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 1.69% | 1.73% | 1.62% | 1.89% | 2.11% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 2.19% | 2.61% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.87% |
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUT.L and WSML.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BUT.L and WSML.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer