BUT.L vs. SMT.L
BUT.L (Brunner Investment Trust) is a stock, while SMT.L (Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc) is Global Equities fund actively managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. Over the past 10 years, BUT.L returned 13.36%/yr vs 19.70%/yr for SMT.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUT.L achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than SMT.L's 27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BUT.L has underperformed SMT.L with an annualized return of 13.36%, while SMT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.
BUT.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
SMT.L
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 6M
- 42.05%
- 1Y
- 51.19%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.70%
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 3.93% | -1.01% | 24.71% | 20.20% | -6.09% | 31.65% | -3.13% | 34.38% | -8.17% | 30.61% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 27.32% | 24.72% | 18.75% | 12.46% | -45.71% | 10.46% | 110.49% | 24.76% | 4.64% | 41.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUT.L and SMT.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1993 | 0.37 |
The correlation between BUT.L and SMT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUT.L vs. SMT.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUT.L
SMT.L
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUT.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.45 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.16 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | 14.08 | -11.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUT.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.54 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.16 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUT.L drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, roughly equal to the maximum SMT.L drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUT.L and SMT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUT.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.93% | -62.61% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -12.26% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -28.05% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -60.11% | +35.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | -60.11% | +22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.27% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -16.03% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.62% | -0.55% |
Volatility
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) is 3.34%, while Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that BUT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUT.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.49% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 16.02% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 20.11% | -6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 29.68% | -10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 28.76% | -8.98% |
Dividends
BUT.L vs. SMT.L - Dividend Comparison
BUT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than SMT.L's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 1.69% | 1.73% | 1.62% | 1.89% | 2.11% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 2.19% | 2.61% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.87% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 0.29% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUT.L and SMT.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BUT.L and SMT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer