BUT.L vs. PSRF.L
BUT.L (Brunner Investment Trust) is a stock, while PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Over the past 10 years, BUT.L returned 13.36%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for PSRF.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUT.L achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than PSRF.L's 15.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUT.L having a 13.36% annualized return and PSRF.L not far ahead at 13.96%.
BUT.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
PSRF.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 3.93% | -1.01% | 24.71% | 20.20% | -6.09% | 31.65% | -3.13% | 34.38% | -8.17% | 30.61% |
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 15.57% | 8.58% | 18.11% | 9.53% | 2.89% | 32.90% | 3.20% | 22.49% | -4.27% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUT.L and PSRF.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between BUT.L and PSRF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUT.L
PSRF.L
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUT.L | PSRF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.67 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 7.35 | -6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | 27.04 | -24.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUT.L | PSRF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 3.61 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.99 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUT.L drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than PSRF.L's maximum drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUT.L and PSRF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUT.L | PSRF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.93% | -38.37% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -4.60% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -18.14% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -18.14% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | -29.79% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | 0.00% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -4.15% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.25% | +1.82% |
Volatility
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Volatility Comparison
Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that BUT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSRF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUT.L | PSRF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 2.12% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 6.29% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 9.36% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 13.32% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 15.79% | +3.99% |
Dividends
BUT.L vs. PSRF.L - Dividend Comparison
BUT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than PSRF.L's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUT.L Brunner Investment Trust | 1.69% | 1.73% | 1.62% | 1.89% | 2.11% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 2.19% | 2.61% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.87% |
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.70% | 1.29% | 1.78% | 1.67% | 1.78% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUT.L and PSRF.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BUT.L and PSRF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer