BULP.L vs. COFF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L).
BULP.L and COFF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. COFF.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Coffee. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. Both BULP.L and COFF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 11.32% | 50.05% | 26.15% | 5.12% | 9.83% | -4.73% | 15.76% | 12.89% | 2.70% | 0.05% |
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee | -12.47% | 20.62% | 77.97% | 18.30% | -11.58% | 64.66% | -14.83% | 9.37% | -22.80% | -24.78% |
Different Trading Currencies
BULP.L is traded in GBp, while COFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULP.L achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than COFF.L's -12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L has outperformed COFF.L with an annualized return of 12.93%, while COFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.
BULP.L
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 44.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
COFF.L
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -13.80%
- 1Y
- -14.51%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- 28.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BULP.L and COFF.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Return for Risk
BULP.L vs. COFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
BULP.L
COFF.L
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULP.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | -0.43 | +2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | -0.40 | +2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.95 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | -0.45 | +2.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | -0.86 | +11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULP.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | -0.43 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.83 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.23 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.05 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULP.L and COFF.L is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULP.L nor COFF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, smaller than the maximum COFF.L drawdown of -84.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULP.L and COFF.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULP.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -88.11% | +43.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.88% | -30.35% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | -41.94% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.68% | -64.13% | +40.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -52.50% | +42.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -58.95% | +42.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 16.23% | -11.94% |
Volatility
BULP.L vs. COFF.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) at 9.49%. This indicates that BULP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULP.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 9.49% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.40% | 22.85% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.61% | 33.85% | -9.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 34.82% | -18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 31.87% | -15.66% |