BUIGX vs. EIVPX
BUIGX (Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund) and EIVPX (Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund) are both Options Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, BUIGX returned 8.96%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for EIVPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUIGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIVPX.
Performance
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUIGX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than EIVPX's 4.72% return.
BUIGX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- 15.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- —
EIVPX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- —
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund | 5.50% | 11.51% | 15.54% | 19.05% | -9.88% | 12.51% | 10.57% | 17.71% | -2.19% | 8.04% |
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 4.72% | 12.90% | 16.45% | 16.83% | -8.64% | 17.96% | 4.74% | 15.46% | -2.80% | 8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUIGX and EIVPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BUIGX and EIVPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUIGX vs. EIVPX — Risk / Return Rank
BUIGX
EIVPX
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) and Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUIGX | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.07 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 20.27 | -4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUIGX drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, smaller than the maximum EIVPX drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUIGX and EIVPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUIGX | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -26.67% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.12% | -3.81% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -12.77% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.22% | -14.07% | -1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.57% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -2.45% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.76% | +0.25% |
Volatility
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) is 2.32%, while Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that BUIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIVPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUIGX | EIVPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 2.91% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.63% | 5.39% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 6.90% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 9.85% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.68% | 11.81% | -0.13% |
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUIGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EIVPX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUIGX vs. EIVPX - Dividend Comparison
BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 3.83% | 4.01% | 2.67% | 5.09% | 7.95% | 1.22% | 0.75% | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BUIGX and EIVPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EIVPX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to BUIGX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUIGX dropped -22.01% vs EIVPX's -26.67%.
EIVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUIGX and EIVPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer