BUG.L vs. URNU.L
BUG.L (Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BUG.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity v2 Index, while URNU.L is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUG.L returned 18.97%/yr vs 29.18%/yr for URNU.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for URNU.L.
Performance
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG.L achieves a 33.09% return, which is significantly higher than URNU.L's -5.06% return.
BUG.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 17.81%
- 6M
- 34.97%
- YTD
- 33.09%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNU.L
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -16.13%
- 6M
- -22.49%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG.L Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 33.09% | -4.88% | 9.30% | 44.09% | -17.89% |
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc | -5.06% | 70.50% | 1.19% | 39.91% | 9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG.L and URNU.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BUG.L and URNU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG.L vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUG.L
URNU.L
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (BUG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUG.L | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.31 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 0.62 | +0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.38%, roughly equal to the maximum URNU.L drawdown of -38.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG.L and URNU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG.L | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.38% | -38.66% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -33.08% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.57% | -38.66% | +2.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -32.58% | +30.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -11.77% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 16.37% | -0.06% |
Volatility
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (BUG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) at 10.24%. This indicates that BUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG.L | URNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | 10.24% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 35.98% | -7.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 50.88% | -18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 41.39% | -12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 41.39% | -12.53% |
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URNU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG.L vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUG.L nor URNU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG.L and URNU.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.
BUG.L is categorized as Cybersecurity, while URNU.L is Uranium. BUG.L tracks Indxx Cybersecurity v2 Index, while URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG.L and 0.65% for URNU.L.
Find the right allocation for BUG.L and URNU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer