BUFY vs. APXM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BUFY (FT Vest Laddered International Moderate Buffer ETF) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BUFY returned 13.37% vs 5.14% for APXM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.

Performance

BUFY vs. APXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered International Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFY achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 2.01% return.

BUFY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APXM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFY vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFY FT Vest Laddered International Moderate Buffer ETF	5.54%	13.16%
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	2.01%	5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFY and APXM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	0.68

The correlation between BUFY and APXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFY vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFY

BUFY Risk / Return Rank: 63
BUFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BUFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BUFY Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BUFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BUFY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

APXM

APXM Risk / Return Rank: 97
APXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
APXM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFY vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered International Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFY	APXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	4.29	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	7.06	-4.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.22	-0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	8.62	-5.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.37	61.17	-48.80

BUFY vs. APXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFY Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the APXM Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFY and APXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFY vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFY drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFY and APXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFY	APXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-0.60%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.65%	-0.60%	-4.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.17%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-0.04%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	0.08%	+1.00%

Volatility

BUFY vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Laddered International Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFY) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) at 0.73%. This indicates that BUFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFY	APXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	0.73%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.74%	1.04%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.92%	1.21%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.48%	1.35%	+7.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.48%	1.35%	+7.13%

BUFY vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFY vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFY nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFY and APXM in my portfolio?

BUFY and APXM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFY or APXM?

BUFY has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to APXM (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFY dropped -8.01% vs APXM's -0.60%.

Which ETF is better, BUFY or APXM?

On 1-year performance, BUFY leads with 13.37% vs 5.14% for APXM. On fees, APXM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, APXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFY or APXM?

Over the 1-year period, BUFY has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFY or APXM?

APXM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BUFY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFY or APXM?

BUFY and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFY and APXM?

Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BUFY and 0.85% for APXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.