BUFS vs. NFTY
BUFS (FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. BUFS is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, BUFS returned 18.99% vs -8.48% for NFTY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFS charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
BUFS vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFS achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.
BUFS
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
BUFS vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFS FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 7.57% | 7.08% | 6.83% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | 5.47% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFS and NFTY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFS vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BUFS
NFTY
BUFS vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.91 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | -0.53 | +4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | -1.39 | +17.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | -0.58 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.28 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
BUFS vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFS drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFS and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -47.67% | +32.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -16.14% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -17.45% | +16.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -9.58% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 6.12% | -4.95% |
Volatility
BUFS vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) is 1.83%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that BUFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFS | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 4.58% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 12.57% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.99% | 14.72% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 17.39% | -6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 20.72% | -9.51% |
BUFS vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFS vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
BUFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFS FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFS and NFTY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to BUFS (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFS dropped -15.03% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 1-year performance, BUFS leads with 18.99% vs -8.48% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BUFS has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFS has performed better with a 18.99% return vs -8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for BUFS.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for BUFS.
BUFS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for BUFS and 0.80% for NFTY.
BUFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFS and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer