BUFQ vs. APRP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP).

BUFQ and APRP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFQ is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ 100 Index - USD. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. APRP is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024.

Performance

BUFQ vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUFQ vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFQ FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF	-1.45%	14.03%	10.79%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	1.89%	7.80%	10.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFQ achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 1.89% return.

BUFQ

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: -1.45%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRP

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 13.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFQ vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFQ has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.

BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

APRP

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April

Return for Risk

BUFQ vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFQ

BUFQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
BUFQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BUFQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BUFQ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BUFQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BUFQ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 81
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFQ vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFQ	APRP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.10	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.45	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.75	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	11.80	-0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFQ vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFQ and APRP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFQ	APRP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	1.04	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between BUFQ and APRP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BUFQ vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFQ nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFQ vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFQ drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, which is greater than APRP's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFQ and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFQ	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.74%	-13.66%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.83%	-8.24%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	0.00%	-2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-1.33%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.22%	+0.38%

Volatility

BUFQ vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 1.98%. This indicates that BUFQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFQ	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	1.98%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	2.97%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.87%	9.96%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.56%	9.76%	+3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.56%	9.76%	+3.80%