PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFP vs. KJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFP vs. KJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFP vs. KJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%
KJAN
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January
0.73%10.90%7.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFP achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than KJAN's 0.73% return.


BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KJAN

1D
2.09%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
0.73%
6M
3.39%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFP vs. KJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFP vs. KJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

KJAN
KJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFP vs. KJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFPKJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.77

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.86

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.81

7.91

+1.90

BUFP vs. KJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFP Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the KJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFP and KJAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFPKJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.48

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BUFP and KJAN is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFP vs. KJAN - Dividend Comparison

BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while KJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

BUFP vs. KJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFP drawdown since its inception was -11.98%, smaller than the maximum KJAN drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFP and KJAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFPKJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-28.94%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.74%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-3.40%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-4.21%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

2.05%

-0.63%

Volatility

BUFP vs. KJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) is 3.41%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that BUFP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFPKJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.21%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.99%

8.65%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

14.04%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.79%

13.04%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.79%

15.59%

-5.80%