BUFF vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. BUFF is passively managed, while PQAP is actively managed. Over the past year, BUFF returned 14.36% vs 21.47% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

BUFF vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

BUFF

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	5.42%	10.90%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and PQAP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.84

The correlation between BUFF and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFF vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF

BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFF	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	4.86	-2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	8.47	-4.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	2.20	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	15.50	-11.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.50	86.25	-64.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFF vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFF	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	4.86	-2.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	1.76	-1.27

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFF	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.23%	-10.79%	-35.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-1.39%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.12%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-0.60%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.25%	+0.42%

Volatility

BUFF vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFF	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.02%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.83%	3.09%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.15%	4.45%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.41%	11.03%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	11.03%	+6.64%

BUFF vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFF vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.78%	1.26%	1.74%	1.55%	0.18%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFF and PQAP in my portfolio?

BUFF and PQAP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFF or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, BUFF or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 14.36% for BUFF. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFF or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFF or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFF or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for BUFF.

What is the main difference between BUFF and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.