PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFF vs. PMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFF vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.19% return.


BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*

PMMY

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.74%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and PMMY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.74

The correlation between BUFF and PMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFF vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFFPMMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

2.45

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

16.90

-12.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.50

89.69

-68.19

BUFF vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the PMMY Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and PMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFFPMMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

5.35

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

4.56

-4.07

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and PMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFFPMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-0.36%

-45.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-0.36%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.04%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-0.04%

-6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.07%

+0.60%

Volatility

BUFF vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.36%. This indicates that BUFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFFPMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.36%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

0.87%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

1.12%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.41%

1.39%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

1.39%

+16.28%

BUFF vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFF vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFF nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
PMMY
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFF and PMMY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs PMMY's -0.36%.

On 1-year performance, BUFF leads with 14.36% vs 5.98% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.50% for PMMY.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFF and PMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer