BUFF vs. BAUG
BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) and BAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index while BAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFF returned 8.71%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for BAUG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAUG.
Performance
BUFF vs. BAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than BAUG's 6.52% return.
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BAUG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 19.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF vs. BAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 9.60% |
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 6.52% | 14.81% | 21.15% | 20.11% | -10.30% | 12.06% | 12.20% | 6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFF and BAUG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BUFF and BAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
BUFF vs. BAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUFF
BAUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BUFF
BAUG
Financial Services
BUFF
BAUG
Communication Services
BUFF
BAUG
Consumer Cyclical
BUFF
BAUG
Healthcare
BUFF
BAUG
Industrials
BUFF
BAUG
Consumer Defensive
BUFF
BAUG
Energy
BUFF
BAUG
Utilities
BUFF
BAUG
Real Estate
BUFF
BAUG
Basic Materials
BUFF
BAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFF vs. BAUG — Risk / Return Rank
BUFF
BAUG
BUFF vs. BAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFF | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.50 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 3.50 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.50 | 17.76 | +3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFF | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.55 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.96 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
BUFF vs. BAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than BAUG's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and BAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFF | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -24.19% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.58% | -5.66% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.24% | -13.78% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.24% | -15.59% | +5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.07% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -2.84% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.11% | -0.44% |
Volatility
BUFF vs. BAUG - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFF | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.00% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 5.83% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 7.79% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 11.70% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 13.95% | +3.72% |
BUFF vs. BAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFF vs. BAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUFF nor BAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFF and BAUG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BAUG (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs BAUG's -24.19%.
On 5-year performance, BAUG leads with 11.16% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, BAUG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAUG has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAUG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF and BAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while BAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for BAUG.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFF and BAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer