BUFB vs. SHV
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV).
BUFB and SHV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFB is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MerQube U.S. Large Cap Equity Buffer Laddered Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 8, 2022. SHV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Short Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both BUFB and SHV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BUFB vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUFB vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFB Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | -1.98% | 13.42% | 16.37% | 20.50% | -8.37% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 1.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 0.81% return.
BUFB
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 14.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFB vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUFB vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
BUFB
SHV
BUFB vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFB | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 19.56 | -18.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 153.08 | -151.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 55.01 | -53.73 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 441.03 | -439.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 2,478.85 | -2,469.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFB | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 19.56 | -18.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 11.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 7.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 4.43 | -3.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFB and SHV is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BUFB vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
BUFB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFB Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 3.98% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
BUFB vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and SHV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFB | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -0.45% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -0.01% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | 0.00% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -0.03% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 0.00% | +1.66% |
Volatility
BUFB vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that BUFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUFB | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 0.05% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 0.13% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 0.21% | +12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 0.29% | +11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 0.28% | +11.89% |