PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFB vs. LOUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFB vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFB vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUFB
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF
-1.98%13.42%16.37%20.50%-8.37%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
-9.90%43.24%21.80%51.31%-41.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than LOUP's -9.90% return.


BUFB

1D
1.90%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
0.48%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
10Y*

LOUP

1D
5.39%
1M
-8.01%
YTD
-9.90%
6M
-6.82%
1Y
51.60%
3Y*
24.76%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFB vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFB vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFB
BUFB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BUFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFB vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFBLOUPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.48

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.08

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.34

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

8.09

+0.79

BUFB vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFB and LOUP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFBLOUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.48

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.44

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BUFB and LOUP is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFB vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFB nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFB vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and LOUP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFBLOUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-58.68%

+43.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-21.00%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-16.74%

+13.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-20.42%

+17.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

6.07%

-4.41%

Volatility

BUFB vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) is 3.84%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that BUFB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFBLOUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

10.91%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

21.85%

-15.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

35.07%

-22.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

32.19%

-20.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

31.98%

-19.81%