PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFB vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFB vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFB vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUFB
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF
-1.98%13.42%16.37%20.50%-8.37%
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
3.19%7.42%12.10%15.36%-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 3.19% return.


BUFB

1D
1.90%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
0.48%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFB vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFB vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFB
BUFB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BUFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFB vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFBKAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.72

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.47

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.10

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

12.86

-3.98

BUFB vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFB and KAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFBKAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.72

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BUFB and KAPR is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFB vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFB nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFB vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and KAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFBKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-16.91%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-8.39%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

0.00%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-4.02%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.37%

+0.29%

Volatility

BUFB vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) at 1.70%. This indicates that BUFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFBKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

1.70%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

3.93%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

10.19%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

11.77%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

11.72%

+0.45%