BUFB vs. BUFP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BUFB (Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds - BUFB tracks the MerQube U.S. Large Cap Equity Buffer Laddered Index - Benchmark TR Gross while BUFP tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BUFB returned 16.02% vs 14.68% for BUFP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.

Performance

BUFB vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's 5.50% return.

BUFB

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 5.58%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFP

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 14.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFB vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFB Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF	5.97%	13.42%	6.46%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	5.50%	12.92%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFB and BUFP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.89

The correlation between BUFB and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFB vs. BUFP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUFB	BUFP
Technology	38.4%	38.4%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	7.9%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

BUFB vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFB

BUFB Risk / Return Rank: 78
BUFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BUFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BUFB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BUFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BUFB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 84
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFB vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFB	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.32	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.41	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.47	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.34	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.22	18.22	-2.00

BUFB vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFB Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFB and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFB vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFB	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-11.98%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-4.41%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-0.97%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-0.99%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.81%	+0.18%

Volatility

BUFB vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 2.12%. This indicates that BUFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFB	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.12%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.17%	5.14%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.67%	6.40%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.98%	9.46%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.98%	9.46%	+2.52%

BUFB vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFB vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

BUFB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFB Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFB and BUFP in my portfolio?

BUFB and BUFP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFB or BUFP?

BUFB has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to BUFP (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFB dropped -14.88% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

Which ETF is better, BUFB or BUFP?

On 1-year performance, BUFB leads with 16.02% vs 14.68% for BUFP. On fees, BUFP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFB or BUFP?

Over the 1-year period, BUFB has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFB or BUFP?

BUFP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFB or BUFP?

BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BUFB.

What is the main difference between BUFB and BUFP?

BUFB tracks MerQube U.S. Large Cap Equity Buffer Laddered Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFP tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFB and 0.50% for BUFP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.