BTPIX vs. QLFRX
BTPIX (Salient Tactical Plus Fund) and QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTPIX charges 1.08%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for QLFRX.
Performance
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTPIX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than QLFRX's 0.58% return.
BTPIX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 10.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
QLFRX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.61%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTPIX Salient Tactical Plus Fund | 6.93% | 1.66% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.58% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTPIX and QLFRX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTPIX vs. QLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
BTPIX
QLFRX
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salient Tactical Plus Fund (BTPIX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTPIX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTPIX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.90 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTPIX drawdown since its inception was -13.30%, smaller than the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTPIX and QLFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTPIX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -14.53% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.66% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -5.67% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | — | — |
Volatility
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTPIX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 15.89% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 15.89% | -9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 15.89% | -7.27% |
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTPIX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTPIX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison
BTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than QLFRX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTPIX Salient Tactical Plus Fund | 2.63% | 2.81% | 3.80% | 4.93% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 6.10% | 6.16% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 4.14% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTPIX and QLFRX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTPIX and QLFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer