BTO vs. FFSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX).
BTO is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Aug 18, 1994. FFSIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
BTO vs. FFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTO vs. FFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 4.20% | 5.85% | 28.92% | -1.16% | -23.58% | 61.86% | -8.97% | 38.87% | -25.68% | 13.12% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | -9.38% | 15.23% | 39.62% | 14.33% | -8.71% | 33.30% | 0.06% | 34.10% | -15.84% | 20.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTO achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than FFSIX's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BTO has underperformed FFSIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while FFSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
BTO
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
FFSIX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTO vs. FFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTO has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTO vs. FFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
BTO
FFSIX
BTO vs. FFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTO | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.27 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 0.49 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.24 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 0.74 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTO | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.27 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.54 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.55 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.31 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTO and FFSIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BTO vs. FFSIX - Dividend Comparison
BTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, less than FFSIX's 7.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 7.25% | 7.41% | 7.28% | 8.64% | 7.51% | 4.72% | 7.25% | 6.06% | 5.94% | 3.76% | 5.10% | 4.75% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | 7.66% | 6.94% | 9.90% | 2.45% | 6.01% | 4.31% | 2.61% | 1.43% | 4.23% | 0.06% | 0.32% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
BTO vs. FFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTO drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSIX drawdown of -75.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTO and FFSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTO | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -75.57% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.79% | -14.39% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.80% | -24.92% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.70% | -45.98% | -19.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.00% | -12.12% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -17.25% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 4.61% | +1.84% |
Volatility
BTO vs. FFSIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that BTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTO | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 4.54% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 12.42% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 21.13% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.47% | 21.15% | +10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.21% | 23.84% | +12.37% |