BTEK.L vs. IITU.L
BTEK.L (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BTEK.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTEK.L returned 5.85%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTEK.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTEK.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTEK.L achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.
BTEK.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 43.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEK.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 4.86% | 23.81% | -0.32% | 0.33% | -1.55% | 0.90% | 23.11% | 21.63% | -6.34% | -3.31% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTEK.L and IITU.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BTEK.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTEK.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BTEK.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Energy
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
Financial Services
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Industrials
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
Real Estate
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Technology
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
Utilities
BTEK.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BTEK.L
IITU.L
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTEK.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 3.17 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.55 | 8.17 | +9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEK.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.71 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.16 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.23 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEK.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEK.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -28.03% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -16.76% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.34% | -28.03% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.86% | -28.03% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -2.89% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -5.14% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 6.51% | -4.06% |
Volatility
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) have volatilities of 6.91% and 7.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEK.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 7.01% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 14.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.14% | 19.60% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 21.94% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 21.31% | +0.40% |
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEK.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEK.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTEK.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTEK.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BTEK.L.
BTEK.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. BTEK.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEK.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for BTEK.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer