BTEK.L vs. ARKG
BTEK.L (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. BTEK.L is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTEK.L returned 5.85%/yr vs -13.66%/yr for ARKG. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTEK.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.
Performance
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTEK.L is traded in GBP, while ARKG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTEK.L achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 25.71% return.
BTEK.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 43.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKG
- 1D
- 6.93%
- 1M
- 22.91%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 61.97%
- 3Y*
- 0.10%
- 5Y*
- -13.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEK.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 4.86% | 23.81% | -0.32% | 0.33% | -1.55% | 0.90% | 23.11% | 21.63% | -6.34% | -3.31% |
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 25.71% | 14.28% | -26.98% | 10.41% | -48.42% | -33.29% | 172.17% | 38.52% | 4.59% | -6.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTEK.L and ARKG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017 | 0.49 |
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTEK.L
ARKG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BTEK.L
ARKG
Basic Materials
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Communication Services
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Consumer Cyclical
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Consumer Defensive
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Energy
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Financial Services
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
Industrials
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Real Estate
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Technology
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Utilities
BTEK.L
-
ARKG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEK.L vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank
BTEK.L
ARKG
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTEK.L | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 2.42 | +3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.55 | 5.62 | +11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEK.L | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.55 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.31 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.19 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -82.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEK.L and ARKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEK.L | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -82.46% | +51.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -25.76% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.34% | -51.48% | +25.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.86% | -78.58% | +47.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -66.98% | +65.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -34.46% | +24.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 11.06% | -8.61% |
Volatility
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) is 6.91%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that BTEK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEK.L | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 12.28% | -5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 28.19% | -13.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.14% | 40.34% | -21.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 43.88% | -23.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 40.33% | -18.62% |
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEK.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEK.L vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTEK.L nor ARKG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% |
BTEK.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTEK.L and ARKG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTEK.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEK.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEK.L and 0.75% for ARKG.
Find the right allocation for BTEK.L and ARKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer