PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTEE.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTEE.L achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.81% return.


BTEE.L

1D
3.30%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.58%
6M
3.18%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*

SWDA.L

1D
0.20%
1M
4.22%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.17%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.58%32.82%-1.69%5.84%-11.88%-0.57%27.55%25.56%-14.84%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.81%21.14%19.09%23.79%-18.13%22.52%15.68%27.97%-9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BTEE.L and SWDA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.60

The correlation between BTEE.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BTEE.L
SWDA.L

Healthcare

100.0%
8.7%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

15.4%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

30.0%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Healthcare

BTEE.L
100.0%
SWDA.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
3.2%

Communication Services

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
5.2%

Energy

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
4.2%

Financial Services

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
15.4%

Industrials

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
10.9%

Real Estate

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
1.8%

Technology

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
30.0%

Utilities

BTEE.L

-

SWDA.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTEE.L
BTEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTEE.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

3.02

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

13.29

+3.42

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTEE.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.27

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.78

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.73

-0.42

Drawdowns

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEE.L drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEE.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-33.62%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-8.59%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-17.07%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

-26.50%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.42%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-4.58%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.95%

+0.52%

Volatility

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.81%. This indicates that BTEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

2.81%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

8.58%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

11.41%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.14%

15.30%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

15.73%

+6.77%

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTEE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.36%0.37%0.46%0.39%0.44%0.25%0.17%0.14%0.07%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTEE.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BTEE.L.

BTEE.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEE.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTEE.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer