PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCZ vs. ETHU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than ETHU's -71.31% return.


BTCZ

1D
5.28%
1M
46.26%
YTD
32.54%
6M
46.67%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHU

1D
-11.44%
1M
-43.11%
YTD
-71.31%
6M
-75.18%
1Y
-75.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
32.54%-29.11%-76.58%
ETHU
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF
-71.31%-64.38%-20.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCZ and ETHU is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

-0.82

The correlation between BTCZ and ETHU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCZ vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHU
ETHU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETHU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCZETHUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.95

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

-0.83

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

-1.21

+3.38

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the ETHU Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCZ and ETHU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCZETHUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

-0.55

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

-0.54

-0.03

Drawdowns

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHU drawdown of -95.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and ETHU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCZETHUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.06%

-95.03%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

-91.56%

+42.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.63%

-95.03%

+16.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.72%

-69.40%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.74%

62.34%

-36.60%

Volatility

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is 17.94%, while Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that BTCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCZETHUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

20.46%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.50%

93.82%

-25.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.46%

137.60%

-50.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.12%

143.09%

-45.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.12%

143.09%

-45.97%

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHU's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCZ vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison

BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ETHU's 5.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
ETHU
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF
5.01%2.31%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCZ and ETHU have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to BTCZ (17.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs ETHU's -95.03%.

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 55.67% vs -75.44% for ETHU. On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 55.67% return vs -75.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.94% for ETHU.

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCZ and ETHU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer