BTCZ vs. ETHU
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCZ returned 55.67% vs -75.44% for ETHU. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for ETHU.
Performance
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than ETHU's -71.31% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU
- 1D
- -11.44%
- 1M
- -43.11%
- YTD
- -71.31%
- 6M
- -75.18%
- 1Y
- -75.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.54% | -29.11% | -76.58% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -71.31% | -64.38% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and ETHU is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.82 |
The correlation between BTCZ and ETHU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
ETHU
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.95 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | -0.83 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | -1.21 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | -0.55 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.54 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHU drawdown of -95.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and ETHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -95.03% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | -91.56% | +42.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.63% | -95.03% | +16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | -69.40% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.74% | 62.34% | -36.60% |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is 17.94%, while Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that BTCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | 20.46% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.50% | 93.82% | -25.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.46% | 137.60% | -50.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 143.09% | -45.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 143.09% | -45.97% |
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHU's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ETHU's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.01% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and ETHU have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to BTCZ (17.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs ETHU's -95.03%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 55.67% vs -75.44% for ETHU. On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 55.67% return vs -75.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.94% for ETHU.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and ETHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer