BTCZ vs. BTC
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCZ returned 55.67% vs -38.61% for BTC. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BTC.
Performance
BTCZ vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than BTC's -25.36% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.74%
- 1Y
- -38.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.54% | -29.11% | -68.08% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -25.36% | -7.50% | 44.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and BTC is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between BTCZ and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
BTC
BTCZ vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCZ | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | -0.89 | +1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | -1.22 | +2.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | -0.78 | +1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | -1.36 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCZ | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | -0.89 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.00 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and BTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -49.34% | -41.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | -49.34% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.63% | -47.98% | -30.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | -16.61% | -57.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.74% | 28.38% | -2.64% |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 9.40%. This indicates that BTCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | 9.40% | +8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.50% | 34.45% | +34.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.46% | 43.69% | +43.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 48.30% | +48.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 48.30% | +48.82% |
BTCZ vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and BTC have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to BTC (9.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs BTC's -49.34%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 55.67% vs -38.61% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 55.67% return vs -38.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.15% for BTC.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer